Will New Superman Building Proposal Stand Chance for Success?
Wednesday, February 12, 2014
Touting that "already a broad cross-section of community leaders, preservationists, unions and business leaders are supporting plans to save the building and the new public private partnership," High Rock is attempting to turn the page on last year's effort to obtain $70 to $75 million in local, state, and federal funding that prompted comparisons to the doomed 38 Studios deal by opponents, who are voicing their concerns now this year as well.
Monique Chartier with RI Taxpayers said, "It is to be hoped that the General Assembly does not move forward with a "public/private partnership" to redevelop or support the Superman Building. While we sympathize generally with High Rock's plight, they should receive nothing from the public sphere beyond what any other property owner might qualify for. State and local taxpayers already pay a high price for a bad economy that was legislatively engendered by an abysmal business climate. State elected officials cannot heap on the additional cost of financially propping up real estate devalued in no small measure by the same bad policies."
Speaker of the House Gordon Fox, who said that last year's proposal was "too costly," said that as far as this year is concerned, it's a "question of numbers. "
“I am always open to listening to a proposal by the developers, and I certainly recognize the importance of the Superman Building to downtown Providence. However, I have not seen any proposals in this legislative session and should we receive one, it will go through the normal legislative hearing process," said Fox. "It is a question of numbers, and last year’s plan seeking state support was deemed to be too costly. The General Assembly reinstated the historic tax credit program last year, and the developer chose not to apply for up to $5 million in credits.”
A New Approach
The coalition of supporters currently includes developer Evan Granoff, Building and Construction Trades President Michael Sabitoni, Providence Preservation Society's Brent Runyon, Cliff Woods with the Downtown Providence Parks Conservancy, and Betaspring's Melissa Withers.
According to High Rock, the "111 Westminster Development Team is reviewing the development economics of the project and will work with federal, municipal and state leaders to find a solution to get the project moving."
Gary Sasse, former Director of Administration and head of RIPEC, said, "For the taxpayer even to consider providing the owners of the Superman Building with preferential tax treatment and or financial assistance independent due diligence should prove the following beyond any doubt."
Sasse said that would entail that "the owners of the property set forth a business plan that both demonstrates that there is a market for the contemplated use of the Superman Building, the business plan demonstrates that the project will be profitable within 2-3 years, the owners provide collateral to secure any state tax expenditures or underwriting, the owners underwrite a share of redevelopment effort for Kennedy Plaza and invest additional equity in the project, and property tax stabilization be for a limited period of time."
"Government does not always do a good job picking winners and losers," continued Sasse. "Public dollars spent for private profits to often produces corporate welfare and 38 Studios type schemes. It is much more cost effective for government to support structural investments in work force development and public infrastructure then one off projects.
Mazze, Taxpayer Groups Voice Concerns
Mazze continued, "Whatever High Rock market studies have shown in the past, private investors do not see the opportunities as the building owner. This is the message that legislators should be hearing. The solution may be to tear down the building. Any investment, including historic tax credits, would bring a small or no return on investment into the foreseeable future. Construction would create jobs but an empty building will create no tax revenue for the city or state. It is time for government leaders to take some action on this building where taxpayer money is not at risk....just say NO."
Lisa Blais with taxpayer advocacy group OSTPA said, "The Superman building is as risky as the 38 studios venture and may cost more than that debacle . The issue with financing such a project is not just RI's current economy, but the projection that jobs will not reach the pre-recession levels in the near future. The state has already undertaken a risky development project - the I 195 parcel. A significant amount of financial resources have been committed to building a "field of dreams" not knowing if, when we build it, they will come."
"The state continues to wait for the return on investment for projects like the Interlink and the North Kingstown train station. RI is so highly leveraged at present, it simply does not seem feasible to force taxpayers to participate in another public/private partnership where the risk is so high," said Blais. "There is nothing different in this session compared with last session, with the exception of the rate of unemployment moving in the wrong direction."
"They want housing, that's great; retail and restaurants, great," said Paolino. "I hear they want to do a public-private partnership, but I'm not sure what that means. Right now they're lining up stakeholders, we're not sure yet what they want from the public. Define help -- help means money."
Paolino said of developer David Sweetser, "Give him credit to say he'd put up a bond to guarantee any work is being done -- you need an assurance bond, of course."
As for the potential of the proposal, Paolino said he had to hear more details. "Are they still looking for the $75 million in city, state, federal aid? You have to compete for the tax credits. That building is so big, they should get $10M in tax credits.
Of the residential part of the equation, Paolino continued, "I think they'd be smart to pursue an 80/20 program," meaning residences would be 80% market rate, and 20% low income.
"Will they have taxes grandfathered in? So they don't increase taxes? Do they want the city to take less in taxes?" posed Paolino. "They've got to be ones to come forth and say, "here's what we want."